Allahabad High Court’s Verdict on Sambhal Mosque Dispute
The Allahabad High Court has delivered its verdict on the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh. The court has directed that the painting work of the mosque be carried out under the supervision of a designated committee. The three-member expert committee will ensure that the historical and structural integrity of the mosque remains intact during the process.
Supervision by a Three-Member Expert Committee
As per the High Court’s order, the committee will consist of:
- An expert from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), who will ensure that no damage is caused to the historical structure of the mosque.
- A scientist, who will analyze the materials used in the painting process.
- An administrative official, who will oversee the entire work.
The High Court has explicitly stated that the painting of the Sambhal Jama Masjid cannot proceed without the committee’s supervision. Additionally, the ASI has been directed to inspect the mosque as part of this process.
Court Considers Ramadan and Structural Concerns
During the hearing, the court acknowledged that the month of Ramadan is approaching, making the painting work necessary. However, the final decision on how the painting will be carried out will depend on the committee’s report to ensure the mosque remains undamaged. The court will continue hearing the matter on Friday, with the case being presented before a single bench of Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal.
Protests and Controversy
Prior to the ruling, members of the Hindu community staged protests against granting permission for painting the Shahi Jama Masjid. Hindu organization activists argued that initiating painting work could escalate the controversy and questioned whether the ASI would take responsibility for any potential disputes. They claimed that the painting work was being used as a pretext for a larger agenda.
Meanwhile, Hindu party lawyer Harishankar Jain stated that after this order, the High Court should no longer consider the structure a mosque. In response, Justice Agarwal instructed his stenographer to record it as an “alleged mosque” in the court order.
